Quantcast
Channel: Hizmet Movement (Gulen Movement) | Fethullah Gulen
Viewing all 4761 articles
Browse latest View live

13 recommendations to MGK secretary for inclusion in 'Red Book'

$
0
0
Veysel Ayhan

The president pays attention to the current National Security Council (MGK). He is determined to declare Hizmet a terror organization. President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is not interested in the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), Kobani, Syria, the approximately 3 million refugees and the murder of 40 people in violent protests. His only concern is Hizmet. Given that the MGK is designed to be a place to discuss personal concerns, I, as a citizen, would like to raise some points of recommendation for the MGK secretary-general for possible inclusion on the agenda of the council.

1- Dear President, you call the Hizmet movement a terror organization. Not a single person affiliated with this movement is being prosecuted for ordinary crimes. These people do not carry even a knife. They do not take to the streets to protest. Even the relatives of the police officers who were illegally placed under arrest recited the Qur'an and performed prayers. Their dormitories and schools were burned down, but they did not respond. You did not call the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), the Kurdistan Communities Union (KCK) or even ISIL terror organizations until your return from the US.

It would have been pretty scary to imagine what would happen to you if you had made insulted other groups like you did to the Hizmet movement. But members of Hizmet did not even raise their voices. What is your intent in trying to declare Hizmet a terror organization? Will grave allegations become invisible when you do this? If somebody else had done this, we would have not paid attention. But given that it is you who made this allegation, I am afraid this move could lead to state-sponsored terror.

2- Dear President, the commanders who attended your meeting almost put an end to the PKK in 2008; but the settlement process revived them. We have continued to patiently believe that this would contribute to the attainment of peace. Cultural rights, including the right to native-language education, should have been recognized without any negotiation, but delays in recognizing these rights exacerbated the situation. True, nobody was killed in the clashes, but the armed forces did not leave. On the contrary, thousands of new militants joined the PKK; the Kurdish people were left to the discretion of the PKK. Over the last two months, 11 soldiers were murdered. No stage of the process was discussed with the military commanders, who were not even informed of what was happening. Was the recognition of Imralı as a peace maker what you meant by settlement process? If this is the case, why are not you appointing Abdullah Öcalan as interior minister instead of Efkan Ala, given that he has no time because he is busy with dealing with Hizmet.

3- The Interior Ministry failed in the Kobani protests. Ala just disappeared. The minister of agriculture tried to maintain safety. Recently, the PKK declared autonomy in Cizre. The police are unable to patrol the area; what is the meaning of subordinating the gendarmerie to the Interior Ministry, which has completely collapsed? Is this a measure to ensure that the gendarmerie does not take action in the event of corruption in the future?

4- Dear President, as citizens, we have always respected supremacy of law. So have the military servicemen attending your meeting. For instance, a former chief of staff served two years in prison. So did other generals and military officers. Admiral İlhami Erdil was imprisoned for corruption. The military servicemen did not ask you to reappoint judges and send police officers into exile.

We, the people, and the military servicemen were respectful of the law. But we are surprised to witness the sons of some ministers and Reza Zarrab released illegally, and your son Bilal made immune to a legal process; we are also shocked to see that those who caught them in the act are now in prison. Most recently, the judges who were assigned to perform a special task sealed the Dec. 17 case. Will the ministers implicated in this case be returned to their former positions? When will they resume their jobs to better serve the nation?

5- Dear President, thank God we are reasonable and mindful people. Let us not joke around. Would you please offer an explanation for the tapes where you are heard whispering? Your supporters may believe you. And the newly appointed head of theScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK), who was previously a director of a zoo, may also argue that this was a fabricated tape. But what will happen to the grave allegations and the five villas referred to in these tapes? That night, Ala issued instructions that nobody should enter and search Bilal's house and that they would not need a court order to remove police officers who attempted to do so. Now, the judiciary is under your control. So this means that you have nothing to worry about. Would you at least inform the MGK members on this matter?

6- Dear President, No public officer has been prosecuted for an attempted coup in the last ten months. The courts also released all police officers who were under arrest. The motions that were referred to Parliament, which were published by the Cumhuriyet daily, indicate that the corruption cases were not a coup attempt. Therefore, there is no evidence for a coup and there are no suspects. In this case, what will happen, considering you previously stated that those who raise allegations and fail to prove them are dishonorable?

7- Dear President, 40 people were killed 25 days ago. A curfew was declared in five cities. The state failed. Did you receive any intelligence that would have helped prevent these violent protests? We have an intelligence agency that does everything but its main job. The suspect in the Paris murders, which placed Turkey in a delicate position in the international arena, was also linked to the National Intelligence Organization (MİT). There is a legal file involving MİT agents who infiltrated the KCK and committed crimes. But this file has been covered up.

And there is the issue of ISIL. It has organized in our country for many years and recruited militants. But we just learned this. I wish the intelligence agency is not accused of grave violations including profiling people, recruiting informants and plotting against its own people and returns to its legal sphere of competence.

8- In public meetings and political rallies, you polarize the people. But when you are accused, you argue that it is the opposition that polarizes the public. You are now unable to appear in public because you promoted hate and polarization. You were even unable to attend the ceremony of the presidential cup. The police officers are unable to protect you in the cities you visit. They have to receive additional support from other cities. Recently, the police department had to ask support from Malatya for your visit to Gümüşhane. Three police officers were killed in an accident on their way back to their original posts.

9- History has not seen a president who tried to lead a bank in his country to bankruptcy. Are not you worried that your policy based on personal hatred is being covered by the renowned news agency Reuters?

10- Your U-turns on the Syria policy in recent months are being ridiculed by the global media. We have become a country mocked in the press. Is the reason for these U-turns the wiretapping that the US, England and Germany admitted to? Or is it because of the alleged money being held in Swiss banks? Would you please deny the allegations that Turkish politics has been taken hostage by such moves?

11- Despite the fact that you took an oath in which you pledged to serve as an independent and impartial president, you still engage in polemics with the opposition. You have become the president of the 20 million people who voted for you. By relying on the political power you hold, you suspended the constitution and turned the political system into a de facto presidential system. The office of the prime minister is now a ceremonial post. Is not this a little bit embarrassing for Ahmet Davutoğlu? Is not the suspension of the constitution an issue of national security?

12- We have become an isolated actor in international politics. Turkey, which received 151 votes in 2008, now receives the support of 60 countries. New Zealand, on the other hand, received 145 votes. What do you think about the deteriorating image of our country? In addition, where would you travel other than Lithuania in your pricy new airplane?

13- There is also the issue of the White Palace, whose construction was costly. A total of 300,000 hectares of cultivable land were destroyed to build this palace. There is also a court order for its demolition. Article 138 of the Constitution was violated and the palace was preserved. Who is behind the decision to construct this huge and pricy building, which is six times the size of the White House and 12 times as large as the Kremlin? The committee of ministers or the Parliament? The Housing Development Administration of Turkey (TOKİ) could have built 30,000 housing units for veterans and the poor by using the TL 1.1 billion that was spent on this building.

Ironically, the establishment of the republican regime will be celebrated in a few days in this building, where residence is not allowed under the laws.

Dear President! These crucial impasses are raising concerns in the minds of people who are not submissive. You should at least persuade the members of the MGK. I promise we will say nothing if they say they are satisfied. We will repeat the following statement for those who make those allegations: “Those who make allegations are obligated to prove their case. In the case that they fail to prove the allegations, they shall be considered dishonorable.”

Published on Sunday's Zaman, 26 October 2014, Sunday

Land tender won by TUSKON reopened in defiance of court decision

$
0
0
The tender for a large parcel of land which was won by the Turkish Confederation of Businessmen and Industrialists (TUSKON) was reopened on Monday, despite a prior court decision barring such a move, according to a statement from the confederation on the same day.

TUSKON -- a business confederation known for having ties to the Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen-inspired Hizmet movement -- acquired the land in 2011 in a tender put out by the Finance Ministry, and agreed to rent it for 49 years at a price of TL 1.6 million per year. However, earlier this year, the Prime Ministry attempted to cancel the ongoing authorization process, which had already been extended on two occasions. A subsequent court decision resulted in a stay of execution which barred the cancellation of the process.

However, according to TUSKON's statement, a new tender was opened for the 36,000-square-meter piece of land on Monday by Emlak Konut GYO -- a subsidiary of the Housing Development Administration of Turkey (TOKİ) -- in defiance of the court decision. A total of 13 companies participated in the first session of the tender process on Monday.

Unfortunately every day the law is broken, judicial decisions are not respected and the basic principles of democracy are being destroyed by those in power in this country,” said TUSKON in its statement. This development is the latest in a series of attempts by the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) to destroy the financial integrity of the Hizmet movement. Since corruption investigations that went public on Dec. 17 of last year, the government has attempted to portray the Hizmet movement as a “parallel state” that orchestrated the investigations to overthrow the government.

The corruption investigations have been halted and the government continues to go after the Hizmet movement. It has attempted to sink the Islamic lender Bank Asya, which is affiliated with the movement, and revoked the license of Hizmet-linked charity Kimse Yok Mu? (Is Anyone There?), thus preventing it from receiving donations.

Published on Today's Zaman, 27 October 2014, Monday

Tyrants do not remain in power long, warns Constitutional Court head

$
0
0
The head of Turkey's top court has said oppressors who are cursed by their victims, as history has shown, are not able to remain in power for long.

“No oppressor [in history] has been able to remain in power for long after he is cursed by the victims whose rights he has violated,” Haşim Kılıç, head of the Constitutional Court, said at an iftar dinner on Sunday.

Noting at the dinner, organized by the World Ehl-i Beyt Foundation, that the history of humanity shows rulers who challenge religious beliefs and freedoms do not emerge victorious, the Constitutional Court head covertly criticized the government, saying the shared values that keep the society together have been ruthlessly destroyed.

In what could be viewed as an obvious reference to the government, Kılıç said at the event that it was highly worrisome that feelings of hatred by those in power have been widely used to demonize rivals.

Particularly since the Syrian civil war began in 2011, the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party), and especially President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, has adopted a discourse based on sectarian themes, thereby alienating the Alevi community in Turkey.

During past election campaigns, then-Prime Minister Erdoğan said during rallies that the leader of the main opposition Republican People's Party (CHP), Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, was of Alevi origin, rhetoric apparently adopted to get the support of Turkey's voters, who are predominantly from the Sunni sect of Islam.

Following a bomb attack in the town of Reyhanlı in Hatay province on the Syrian border last year, Erdoğan referred to the 53 Turks who lost their lives in the blast as “Sunni citizens,” as if to point out and also demonize the Alawite character of the Syrian regime.

Kılıç in his speech underlined that discourse based on hatred towards segments of society, which is something the government has also adopted towards the Hizmet movement since the launch of two graft probes in December of last year, would lead to the ruin of society.

Following the graft probes, as part of which four of the government's Cabinet ministers had to resign, the government started a witch hunt against alleged sympathizers of Hizmet, a faith-based group inspired by Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen, without providing any solid evidence for their action.

The government accused Hizmet of being behind the probes and of plotting against the government as part of an international plot.

Interior Minister Efkan Ala left the event after making his speech without waiting for the Constitutional Court head to make his. Mustafa Kamalak, chairman of the Felicity Party (SP), Mustafa Destici, leader of the Grand Unity Party (BBP) and Öznur Çalık, deputy chairman of the AK Party, were also present at the event, which was organized at a hotel in Ankara on the occasion of the Alevis' sacred month of Muharrem.

Alevism is viewed by a great majority of Alevis as a heterodox sect of Islam, though some see it as being outside of Islam. Alevis are estimated to make up 10-15 percent of Turkey's population.

Published on Cihan, 27 October 2014, Monday

The fate of prosecutors

$
0
0
Ekrem Dumanlı

An election was held at the Ankara Bar Association recently. Nuh Mete Yüksel, who was among the powers that be in the prosecutorial community in the past, entered while this was taking place. He was once an awe-inspiring prosecutor. Apparently, he retired from prosecuting and became a lawyer. Of course, he is now deprived of the terrifying appearance he had in those years. He no longer has the frigid countenance that would send everyone's hearts throbbing with fear. As it happens, some lawyers started to protest harshly the “fledgling lawyer.” Moreover, the hall was filled with shouts of "Go away!" So Yüksel had to go back without casting his vote...

But as he was a former prosecutor, he didn't give up just yet, and returned to the hall in the company of several police officers. The shouts in the hall were increased. "You are not a lawyer, but a torturer," dozens of people were shouting. In the face of mounting reactions, Yüksel had to run away from the hall in panic and fear. You can watch the video on the Internet. He was gripped by panic and intimidation. However, he had been a "nightmare" for certain social groups until very recently. As a prosecutor, he would summon anyone to testify if he got angry with him/her, and he would launch lawsuits against groups he didn't like.

When the prime minister of the time had roared, "Teach this lady her place," Yüksel had personally organized a midnight raid on the house of Merve Kavakçı, a female deputy from the now-defunct Welfare Party (RP) who had entered Parliament wearing a headscarf. He was stalking Leyla Zana and several other pro-Kurdish deputies. He had brought a lawsuit against Fethullah Gülen just because this was the wish of the despots of the post-modern coup of Feb. 28, 1997 -- when the Turkish military forced the RP-led coalition government out of power, citing alleged rising religious fundamentalism in the country -- and he demanded Mr. Gülen's extradition from US authorities; when they declined his demand, he had sent questions to the US authorities so that Mr. Gülen could be questioned there. He was so obsessed with vindication that he had summoned Hakan Şükür, one of the greatest players in Turkish soccer history, for testimony, just because he expressed respect for Mr. Gülen.

Can you see what happened to our prosecutor in the end? He has become a lawyer, but he cannot meddle with his colleagues and he cannot cast his vote. A specific group of lawyers reacts negatively toward him. What about other groups? Do they support him? No, this is not the case in the least. Even those lawyers who don't fiercely shout "Go away" are angry with him. And they have every reason to flare up in anger. This is because his role in undermining the sense of justice was great as he treated many groups harshly. Although he was tasked with the duty of collecting evidence both in favor and against the suspects under law, he categorically opted for siding with the powers that be and despots.

Yüksel's deplorable fate makes us remember those like him in the past: Nurettin Soyer, Savaş Vural, Nusret Demiral, Sabih Kanadoğlu and many more. Unfortunately, they alienated the public from justice. They assumed that the extraordinary periods they were operating under would continue forever, and their unlawful acts would go unpunished. But they were wrong.

Similar misconceptions apply to today's prosecutors (and, of course, judges). It is sad to see that those who prefer to be prosecutors for a specific party or ideology, and not for the state, do not learn their lesson from history.

In contrast, there were also honorable prosecutors who championed freedoms and upheld both their dignity and the prestige of their profession. Even if they suffered from troubles and problems for a certain period of time, they were eventually applauded by everyone. Ferhat Sarıkaya and Sacit Kayasu were disbarred under duress from the dictatorship, but over time, this mistake was rectified and their rights were reinstated.

Ironically enough, it seems that some prosecutors (and judges) are walking in the footsteps of Yüksel. I hope this is not really the case. However, this is the impression the public has. For instance, a prosecutor, speaking to journalist Fatih Altaylı, made some hair-raising remarks. It was claimed that this prosecutor was Okan Özsoy. He didn't refute the allegations. Referring to the Hizmet movement, this prosecutor said 500,000 people were detained during the military coup of Sept. 12, 1980 and the state might do it again. What a horrendous approach! I want to believe that prosecutor Özsoy didn't make such a remark, or if he did, he had realized his remarks went beyond their intended purpose. Indeed, the coup of Sept. 12, 1980 was a state of insanity where human values and justice were suspended. It is hard to assume that a prosecutor does not know this plain truth. The same applies to Serdar Coşkun, a prosecutor in Ankara. The infamous "official letter" sent to certain provinces was a sheer legal scandal.

There are also media reports about other prosecutors who indulge in similar unlawful quests. I want to believe these allegations about unlawful practices and judicial militancy are nothing but rumors. Indeed, I had uncovered certain allegations regarding İsmail Uçar, a prosecutor in İstanbul. This prosecutor announced that these allegations were not true. This made me happy both for justice and on his behalf.

Prosecutors, judges, police officers and all public officials must be aware of the fact that they are servants of the state, not of a party, government, army or ideology. Whoever strays from justice under the influence of the current circumstances commits a crime. It has been our experience that legal professionals who opt for militant practices in extraordinary times are not held in high esteem in later years.

Mud

Famous poet and intellectual Necip Fazıl Kısakürek is rumored to have said: "We have made the icebergs melt with our breath. Now, the mud is everywhere." May your soul rest in peace, Master! What you said has occurred, exactly as you described.

“False heroes” are everywhere. Those who lack any depth in knowledge or experience have created a sea of mud. There is the risk of the century-old struggle being squandered by the prodigal parvenu lot. A generation of people who are inexperienced in this struggle and who are not willing to suffer for the sake of it found themselves in a false spring and rushed to play with the sand in their first playground. They built sand castles with toy shovels and fell asleep next to their works made of sand.

This land had seen so many long-time sufferers: Mehmet Akif, Bediüzzaman Said Nursi, Eşref Edip, Osman Yüksel, Esad Efendi, Süleyman Efendi, and many more… All went through colossal suffering. They were prosecuted, arrested and were subjected to slander. But they didn't deviate from the road of justness even an inch. They sacrificed themselves to train people, safeguard peace and promote social peace. Accordingly, they were loved by everyone. They didn't polarize, divide, denigrate or stigmatize society. Those masters didn't exhibit any act of rowdiness. They didn't bully anyone.

And now?

The people who have not experienced any struggle in the name of Islam or who have not been troubled with the task of training people are acting with arrogance and seeking to serve their own personal interests. Unfortunately, their antipathetic discourse is alienating ordinary people from Islam. They adopt a selfish, arrogant and peremptory attitude toward every matter, unaware of how they are humiliating themselves and how they make this country and the values it represents a matter of global mockery.

What in the world is this low-bred, characterless rhetoric of certain papers and TV channels and certain politicians? It is of such a low caliber that it breeds hatred on a large scale. It makes people enraged en masse. Moreover, this rage does not remain restricted to certain people, but certain other figures market their ham-fisted approach as championing the "cause" of Islam, not knowing that they are actually undermining the prestige of Islam.

Yes, the icebergs have melted, but those whose pens are tainted with the mud are now wasting the gains made in a century-old cause. A small group of people are acting with a lust for governing and a craze to make everyone submit to them. now, knowing that their hands, tongues and hearts are tainted with mud. We are faced with a mentality of people who are churning out lies, believing that it is a holy war (jihad) to oppress other people.

Those who pen articles using this mud as ink and those who take a shower of mud before making an appearance on TV should stop trying, as they cannot stain the people who deflect that mud with their tears. These people should not tire themselves out in vain, as might does not make right, but right makes might. Slinging mud at people is not fair. Nor is it humanitarian or Islamic.

Published on Today's Zaman, 27 October 2014, Monday

What a plot attempts to tell

$
0
0
Begüm Burak

The film “Birleşen Gönüller” (The Converging Hearts) was released to Turkish audiences on Friday.

I think the “money pool media” will stigmatize it in the news as a movie of the “parallel state” and condemn the actors for working for the parallel state. Such news stories are, unfortunately, quite normal in today's Turkey. However, such piffles cannot at all overshadow the success of the film.

The film is based on a true story that begins in the Soviet Union during the years of World War II and reaches Central Asia in the 1990s.

It has a touching plot. Yunus, a committed teacher, and his wife, Dilek, leave their homeland Turkey with their two children for Kazakhstan to open a Turkish school. Dilek is reluctant to move and experiences hard days there since Yunus spends almost all of his time readying the Turkish school. Cennet, an elderly woman who has been waiting for her husband to come home for half a century, helps Dilek get accustomed to her new life. Cennet tells her story to Dilek to show her she can also be patient.

Cennet married Niyaz 50 years ago, in a time of war. Her beloved husband is taken by the Soviet army to join the military and fight against the Germans. After a while, the village where Cennet lives is occupied by the Nazis and Cennet is sent to a labor camp. Cennet and Niyaz, who escaped from the army to see his wife, find each other. They make a plan to escape the labor camp, but in the end they are pulled apart again. Cennet is still waiting for Niyaz 50 years later because she has made a promise to him.

The sacrifice and love that drive Yunus to open a school in Kazakhstan are comparable to the eternal love Cennet bears in her heart for her husband. One day, Cennet and Niyaz find one another again in a magical way, helped by Yunus and Dilek's existence in Kazakhstan.

This film is a must-watch for any person who wants to know how the Hizmet movement has reached 160 countries. The teachers who leave everything behind to go to far-away places have only one dream: To put love and fraternity in every heart they can reach. This dream cannot be achieved without pain, patience and the shedding of tears. Thus, the tears of Dilek in the film and the pain Cennet feels mean so much more in real life.

Hizmet, through building bridges between different cultures all around the world, has succeeded in reaching more than 160 countries. Young teachers who have graduated from prestigious universities have not chosen to earn a great deal of money; they have chosen absence from home to share the invaluable things they have with people they can reach. Such a sacred commitment cannot be understood by those who don't know what altruism means. “Birleşen Gönüller” tells us to keep our hope alive through bad times and that this is what life is meant to be.

Published on Today's Zaman, 27 October 2014, Monday

Pro-government media allowed to lie, ignores compensation penalties

$
0
0
Media outlets within the government's sphere of influence have ignored court orders for them to publish retractions of fabricated stories, especially about the Hizmet movement after the corruption scandals that were made public on Dec. 17 and Dec. 25.

Media outlets like Sabah, Yeni Akit, Yeni Şafak and Takvim are among other news organizations with close affiliations with the government that have shrugged off over 30 judgments about publishing corrections of stories that contain slanderous remarks about Muslim scholar Fethullah Gülen, whose teachings inspired the Hizmet movement.

Hizmet is a voluntary movement that spreads ideas of interfaith dialogue and the significance of education in combatting global poverty and ignorance.

According to the law, media organizations must publish statements that refute the previously published stories if ordered to do so by a court ruling. These refutations must be on the same page, with the same size and font as the original story. If they fail to do so, they can be fined somewhere between TL 50,000 and 150,000 depending on the severity and reach of the story and the type of publication. The money collected from papers that fail to publish official denials goes to the Treasury as revenue.

For every unpublished refutation of a story about the Hizmet movement Gülen's lawyers have initiated legal proceedings.

Gülen's lawyers have won more than 100 lawsuits about stories that aimed to defame their client with assertions like attempting a coup d'etat, managing a terrorist organization, etc. Legally wiretapped tape recordings, which were made public in the corruption files, revealed that some newspapers follow direct orders from the government and President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Now it appears that they are either not heeding these court orders or publishing the refutations in small font in obscure parts of the papers, even if the original articles were front page headline news.

Published on Cihan, 27 October 2014, Monday

Government blocks bank accounts of aid organization

$
0
0
The Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government's efforts to disrupt the work of Turkey's leading aid organization Kimse Yok Mu (Is Anybody There) continues with the unlawful blocking of the organization's bank accounts on Oct. 22.

President of Kimse Yok Mu İsmail Cingöz told Today's Zaman that the government's decision to block their organization's bank accounts was an attempt to paralyze the aid organization, which was found to be clean following extensive legal investigations.

Cingöz said that the accounts of Kimse Yok Mu at two banks, Garanti and Akbank, were blocked following a note from the İstanbul Governor's Office. Cingöz says that Kimse Yok Mu were not privy to the content of the note, although they were told that several banks received it.

In an earlier decision, which Kimse Yok Mu filed a legal complaint against, the Cabinet made it illegal for the charity to raise money without prior permission from the Government on Sept. 22. Cingöz said that although the decision was groundless, the charity asked the banks not to accept funds for specific campaigns, but the Governor's Office now prevents access to their previously collected money by violating the existing rights of the charity. Cingöz noted that Kimse Yok Mu will file a legal complaint against the Governor's Office, the department of associations within the Ministry of Interior and the two banks.

Kimse Yok Mu has already issued legal complaints against officials who were involved in a smear campaign against the aid organization, which feels threatened by the government due to its affiliation with the Hizmet movement. Cingöz said that due to arbitrary investigations and fabricated reports on the charity, they are suing Minister of Interior Efkan Ala, his undersecretary and the director of department of associations Yılmaz Doruk, asking for 10 million TL compensation.

The government stopped aid

Criticizing the government's deliberate efforts to undermine Kimse Yok Mu, Cingöz says that the decision to make obtaining permission obligatory for all aid campaigns, the government is blocking aid to millions of people.

Cingöz refered to the remarks of Deputy Prime Minister Bülent Arınç who asked Kimse Yok Mu to write a petition when it needs permission to raise money. Cingöz says that the government's aim is to cripple the charity. Since Sept. 22, Kimse Yok Mu applied for permission to raise money for seven different aid campaigns, but the government has not responded to them. Cingöz says there is 60-day time limit for responses, but it is most likely that the government will wait until the last minute to reject their requests.

According to Cingöz, by pending the requests, the government is preventing aid reaching people in Gaza, Palestine, Syria, Turkmens and the rebuilding of the schools in southeastern Turkey, which were burned in terrorist attacks.

The government aimed to prevent timely delivery of eid aid

According to Cingöz, the government's decision was well planned in terms of timing. The official notice was delivered on Oct. 2, just two days before eid al-adha, for which people had already donated money for animals to be slaughtered and delivered to the poor.

“By the time we received the official note we had already collected the money for the meat delivery,” Cingöz said. According to him, had they not delivered the animals to poor, they could have been accused of misuse of funds, as some associations have in the past.

No new legal decision can be applied to past campaigns as Cingöz says and Kimse Yok Mu is still authorized to raise money from donations, though not for specific campaigns.

As far as the alleged government plans to appoint a trustee to the charity, Cingöz says that had the government discovered the slightest malpractice, they would have done so. “I wonder what crime they will attribute to us,” Cingöz said as he challenged the government one more time to find any evidence of fraud.

Rule of law continually violated by gov't

Speaking to Today's Zaman regarding the decision to freeze the Kimse Yok Mu's bank accounts, main opposition Republican People's Party (CHP) Deputy Chairman Mehmet Bekaroğlu defined the implementation as unlawful.

“This is an unacceptable decision. The government's blatant and arbitrary moves know no limit. We are encountering lawlessness similar to the Feb. 28, 1997 process. [An unarmed military intervention that resulted in the fall of the coalition government led by Necmettin Erbakan of the now-defunct Welfare Party (RP) under the leadership of Gen. Çevik Bir]. If there is an offense and criminals, then the courts launch the needed legal process. A civil society group or a segment of society cannot be targeted through various reasons,” he added.

Criticizing the government's arbitrary decisions about the charity, former İzmir Mayor Burhan Özfatura emphasized that the political administration is acting on the basis of revenge and hatred, adding: “It violates the law blatantly. Blocking Kimse Yok Mu's bank account is unconscionable and contradicts the law regulating aid organizations' authority to hold aid campaigns and collect money. It is a fact that previous examinations into the charity came out clean.”

Criticizing the government's concessive attitude towards the settlement process being conducted between the government and the outlawed Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), Özfatura went on: “Those people who struggle to serve their country are deprived of the tolerance that is shown towards the terrorists. Cruel treatment of businesspeople affiliated with the [faith-based] Hizmet movement is continuing. The rule of law is continually violated.”

Published on Today's Zaman, 27 October 2014, Monday

Fethullah Gülen speaks at UN

$
0
0
Selçuk Gültaşlı

Amid strong efforts by President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to declare him a terrorist, Fethullah Gülen addressed the United Nations on Oct. 24.

It seems that US President Barack Obama and the rest of the world have not taken the Turkish president seriously on this matter. The Journalists and Writers Foundation (GYV), the Swiss Dialogue Institute and the University of Geneva jointly organized a peace summit titled “Mobilizing Civil Society for Building Peace” at the UN Center in Geneva. The event attracted a great deal of attention, as evidenced by the participation of renowned individuals, including Hassan al-Benna's grandson Tariq Ramadan; Ela Gandhi, the granddaughter of Mahatma Gandhi, whose statue stands in the garden of the UN Center; and Gunnar Johan Stalsett, from the Norwegian Nobel Committee. A total of 800 renowned figures from 50 countries participated in this gathering.

Gülen inaugurated the conference, which was held in the building where 70 percent of the UN's activities are held, where more than 9,500 UN staff work and 176 out of 193 UN members are represented by ambassadors. Gülen was not there physically, but the hall was packed when his message was read aloud by German historian and journalist Jochen Thies.

Pro-government figures reportedly approached some of these renowned individuals and asked them not to attend a program sponsored by the Hizmet movement, which they argued was working to serve the interests of the CIA. One of the participants sarcastically responded that he had thought they were working for the Mossad. In any case, that person attended the meeting, suggesting that the pro-government figure's argument was not convincing.

Daniel Hyslop, one of the researchers at the Institute of Economics and Peace in Australia, made a striking analysis at the peace summit. The institute, trying to measure peace, identified eight elements for a peaceful society. Their research indicates that for a peaceful society, it is necessary to have a low level of corruption, a high level of education, free movement of information, good relations with neighbors, recognition of the rights of others, fair distribution of resources, provision of safe work environments and a well-operating bureaucracy. All these elements are interlinked and they mutually affect each other.

Now let us try to measure Turkey's performance based on these criteria. It would be unnecessary to make any analysis on the level of corruption. So let us skip this element. When it comes to the issue of a high level of education, it is obvious that Turkey is doing poorly in this field despite numerous educational reforms. It is sufficient to take a look at what has been happening to journalists, who have been fired and intimidated, to measure Turkey's performance in the field of free movement of information. Good relations with the neighbors are also not fulfilled by Turkey, which is far away from fulfilling its goal of "zero problems with neighbors." It is not possible to argue that there is a safe work environment in Turkey given that the president made grave statements against Bank Asya and that scores of workers have died in jobsite accidents.

If we consider all these standards and criteria, we would conclude that Turkey should be worried about attaining peace. Turkey is becoming a country that suffers from a lack of peace and domestic tranquility.

The Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP) has drafted a global peace report based on 22 variables defined out of these eight peace elements. Turkey is ranked 128th out of 162 countries in this index; Angola, Cameroon, Congo, Mauritania, Honduras, Guatemala and Ecuador are doing better than Turkey.

We should congratulate the GYV for organizing this peace conference despite the fact that the government has mobilized its resources to declare the GYV as a center of terrorism. I am surprised that the pro-government media has not yet made a report that reads as follows: “Parallel UN: Terrorists hold peace conference.”

Published on Today's Zaman, 27 October 2014, Monday

Related

'The Gulen movement is one of the very few that has managed to live what it preaches.'

$
0
0
Fikir Atlasi*, Episode 12 (Full text)

I’m Khaled Abou Fadl**. I’m a professor of law at UCLA School of Law and an author of a number of books on Islamic theology and law.

Hizmet Movement is, in my view, an Islamically-inspired, Islamically-grounded movement, or Islamically-rooted movement, founded on the universal and fundamental principle of peace and—the essential values of Islam—peace, mercy and compassion, as normative, moral objectives and that seeks to translate these principles into—through the dynamic of ta’aruf, the dynamic of coming to know one another, especially coming to know the other—into a reality, into a living sociological and anthropological reality.

I cannot do justice to the critical importance of this thought—Gulen’s thought and theological outlook—to the contemporary Muslim world because it offers for Muslims an authentic, legitimately rooted methodology of dealing with modernity and challenges that exist in the modern world.

And so, it focuses on what you can say is the nectar of Islam, the core, the heart or the spirit of Islam itself.

It doesn’t get lost in the forest; it doesn’t get lost in the trees; it doesn’t get lost in the massive accumulations of interpretive traditions upon interpretive traditions, but, at the same time, it is not dismissive of tradition, which is very important.

It is not an arrogant movement; it is not a movement that considers itself as the exclusive voice of the Divine. And so, what I very much, not just find attractive but compelling about Gulen’s writings is his emphasis on love as a critical value, the emphasis on Islam being a state of peace, an embodiment of peace—whether it be inner or social or international—without confining this to a tariqah in itself, as in a Sufi tariqah.

So, it really becomes an attitude or a theology of embracing the Divine and embracing all that the Divine has created, embracing Allah as a transcendental Creator but considering all that God has created as valuable and worthy of love.

And that type of narrative is not, unfortunately, is not heard in the modern Muslim world often. In fact, it is quite missing.

In my view, it is a true unfortunate shame that the writings of Gulen are not widespread, especially in the Arabic-speaking world, which, in my view, badly needs this system of thought and this way of thinking and this narrative generally.

And this is, again, what I think is very special about Gulen’s thought and the Gulen Movement, in particular, is that it brings back Islam to its essential humanistic message, its fundamental invitation from the Divine for human beings to be human and to put that humanity, those characteristics of humanity—humanness—above all.

I’ve often wondered if—instead of Islam being known to the world through the various movements that commit violence and so on—if Islam was known to the world through the thought of the Gulen-like theology, so, instead of travelling around the world and finding people associating Islam with the most barbaric and cruel and harsh things, if you would find people associating Islam with the quintessential humanistic principles of mercy, compassion, love, understanding, I’ve often wondered what type of a world it would be because it would definitely be a much better world than the one we exist in.

I’d like to say the Gulen movement is one of the very few that—in our world—has managed to come out of the borders of one country and to actually talk to people, in other words, to live what it preaches, to actually show that it’s possible to do that, to cross borders, to engage others and bring people together on a common, universal, humanistic message.

From what I have observed, or from my studies, it seems that the Gulen Movement has become far more adept at constructing serious discourse and serious dialogue that is substantive, that you can actually learn from substantively because it encourages people to come and bring out what is inside of them.

Which of course… unfortunately for one of the things I remember is, I had one of my students who had read an attack on the thought of Nursi and Gulen by an Islamaphobic source, and this fellow was very puzzled by it: “Why are they attacking them?” I told him it was because they are more dangerous to religious bigots than the worst enemy because, if you’re coming from a moral paradigm, someone who is determined to live immorally will find you extremely threatening, and I think that speaks volumes in itself. That says a lot…

**Profile: Dr. Khaled Abou El Fadl is one of the world’s leading authorities on Islamic law and Islam, and a prominent scholar in the field of human rights. He is the Omar and Azmeralda Alfi Distinguished Professor in Islamic Law at the UCLA School of Law. He serves on the advisory board of Human Rights Watch.

*Produced by Spectra Media exclusively for Irmak TV, Atlas of Thoughts (Fikir Atlasi) connects the scholars, politicians, jurists, religious figures, journalists, and academics reflecting on Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gulen and the Hizmet Movement with the audience. Each episode features a person from a different segment of the society with diverse experiences regarding the Hizmet activities and its volunteers. If you are interested to hear about the Hizmet and Mr. Gulen from these people’s perspectives, do not miss this show!
Source: Fikir Atlasi (Episode 12), © Spectra Media, 10 April 2014, Thursday

Despite blocking accounts, Kimse Yok Mu able to collect donations

$
0
0
Despite the latest step in a government crackdown on Turkey's UN-affiliated aid organization, Kimse Yok Mu, in which two banks blocked the organization's accounts, administrators for the charity have said they are still able to collect money through their other accounts.

On Monday, Garanti Bank and Akbank unlawfully blocked the bank accounts of Kimse Yok Mu, citing a government decision on Sept. 22 to remove the organization's ability to raise donations for its campaigns without prior permission.

Yusuf Yıldırım, Kimse Yok Mu's foreign aid coordinator, told Today's Zaman on Tuesday that over 3 million donors have been able to deposit money through other banks. He noted that in addition to three major branches in İstanbul, Kimse Yok Mu has 40 branches in Turkey, and that donors could make donations in person as well. Yıldırım criticized the efforts to undermine Kimse Yok Mu's global aid campaigns and noted that those receiving help from the organization will be hurt by these actions.

Opposition: Undermining CSO without court decision a ‘serious issue'

The opposition has also criticized the actions against Kimse Yok Mu.

Republican People's Party (CHP) Deputy Chairman Levent Gök said on Tuesday that the unlawful treatment of Kimse Yok Mu is unacceptable. If an investigation ascertains that a crime has been committed, it should be tried in independent courts, and attempting to discredit civil society organizations is a serious issue, Gök said. "The rule of law is required for everyone, and I reject this treatment of Kimse Yok Mu," Gök stated.

According to Gök, the government is attempting to eliminate everyone that is not one of them by means of exerting pressure.

Gök also complained about the government's indifference towards existing court rules by giving the example of the Ak Saray, a new presidential complex that was originally designed as an office for the prime minister. The lavish office and residential complex has been at the center of debates because it was built despite a court decision stipulating the end of the construction due to its location in a protected area.

Kimse Yok Mu can account for each kuruş of donation

Meanwhile, the Jerusalem office director of Kimse Yok Mu, Harun Tokak, said on Tuesday on a TV program that the organization is able to explain what each and every kuruş is spent on. Challenging the government by saying "they can try us in any court they want," Tokak underlined that despite a year-long investigation into Kimse Yok Mu, the government has not been able to find a single piece of evidence pointing to fraud.

Tokak said the Hizmet movement, which inspires the work of Kimse Yok Mu, has been delivering help to people all around the world, regardless of religion, language or ethnicity.

Published on Today's Zaman, 28 October 2014, Tuesday

Turkey will hurt own interests if gov't shuts down Kimse Yok Mu

$
0
0
Former Director for East African Affairs for the US State Department Professor David Shinn said in an interview, “If the government of Turkey is trying to shut down Kimse Yok Mu (Is Anybody There) it would seem to be a case of hurting its own interests in Africa.”

Kimse Yok Mu, which holds official UN consultative status and is Turkey's largest global aid organization, has had many of its rights as a charity revoked by the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) due its affiliation with the Hizmet Movement since corruption investigations became public on Dec. 17 and 25, 2013. President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan holds the Hizmet Movement, a grassroots social initiative known for its educational and cultural programs, responsible for the investigations, which implicated some of his inner political circle and family members.

In an interview with the private Cihan news agency, Shinn, a former US diplomat and professor of international affairs at George Washington University, said, “Unless there is proof that an organization has engaged in corruption or illegal activity or is totally incompetent, and I don't believe this is the case with Kimse Yok Mu, any effort by a government to shut down a non-governmental organization will send a chilling message to similar organizations and those who benefitted from its efforts.”

Regarding what he thought about Kimse Yok Mu's donation campaign around the world, Professor Shinn, an expert on the Horn of Africa, said: “I will limit my remarks to Kimse Yok Mu in Africa, which accounts for most of its activities outside Turkey. From 2010 through 2013, almost 68 percent of all external Kimse Yok Mu funding went to countries in Africa. In 2013, Kimse Yok Mu distributed about $17.5 million to 43 countries in Africa.”

Shinn, who served for 37 years in the US Foreign Service with assignments at embassies all over Africa, continued: “Most Africans perceive Kimse Yok Mu as a Turkish aid program, not a Hizmet or Gülen-affiliated program. When doing research in Africa, the comments that I heard about Kimse Yok Mu from both Africans and Hizmet representatives were universally positive. Its activities helped give Turkey a good image.”

When asked what it says about a government if it shuts down a relief organization, Shinn said: “I don't know all the details behind the relationship between Kimse Yok Mu and the government of Turkey. Kimse Yok Mu is seen in Africa as a Turkish assistance program that is well received. If the government of Turkey is trying to shut it down, it would seem to be a case of hurting its own interests in Africa.”

The former US ambassador, who is also writing a book on the Hizmet Movement in Africa, went on to say, “If the government is trying to shut down the program, it would seem to send all the wrong signals to Africa and raise questions in the operations of other Turkish NGOs that provide assistance outside of Turkey.”

Kimse Yok Mu is the only aid organization in Turkey that holds UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) special consultative status, and it developed internationally recognized relief programs in partnership with the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHCR) in 2013. It was also granted the Turkish Grand National Assembly Outstanding Service Award in 2013.

Published on Today's Zaman, 28 October 2014, Tuesday

Erdoğan's personal propaganda tool, the MGK

$
0
0
Mümtazer Türköne

Like the National Security Agency (NSA) in the US, or the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) in Germany, the MGK in Turkey -- the National Security Council -- is the land's highest coordinator for state security. With constitutional reforms made in the wake of European Union reforms that led to an increase in the number of civilian members on this high security board, the general weight of government representatives on the MGK became much more formidable. Debates surrounding the MGK always reflect power struggles within the ranks of the state. And in the past, of course, the military used this board to design and guide politics. In fact, the most recent military coup in Turkish history -- the Feb. 28, 1997 process -- sprung from a MGK meeting and the decisions reached at this meeting.

These days, in the newly civilianized MGK, the military doesn't carry nearly as much weight as in the past. But while the roles may have switched, the content of undemocratic decisions has not. There is less of a struggle over security coordination and more of a struggle over power that we see sitting at the top of the agenda of this council.

There are some very critical security problems that compose the agenda of the MGK. The whole Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) problem, as well as the clashes underway in Kobani, has turned into both a domestic as well as an external security problem for Turkey. The recent killing of three unarmed soldiers in Hakkari's Yüksekova was just one piece of the ongoing armed threat of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK). In the meantime, the opening up of a corridor into Kobani, and the fact that armed peshmerga will be travelling through Turkey and into Kobani, represents the most pressing issue for the MGK at this point. The Turkish public is hearing directly from its commander in chief of the armed forces that in fact he is not in the loop and informed when it comes to either the peace process underway with the PKK or the passage of peshmerga over Turkish land and into Syria. The MGK is not even able to fulfill its most basic duties of coordination. So what is it doing these days?

What we see instead is that the MGK is being used as a propaganda tool for President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's personal policies and priorities.

In statements made to the press by Erdoğan, one can see how he himself has manufactured the agenda for the MGK and thus how this new kind of propaganda is functioning. After all, Erdoğan is using every tool in hand to wage a war against the Fethullah Gülen movement. His extraordinary campaign against Bank Asya is just one facet of this war. He is now using the MGK to try to condemn the Gülen movement, which must be one of the world's most peaceful movements, as an “illegal organization.” It is almost inconceivable that as a foundation known to be close to Gülen in Geneva works to help coordinate a United Nations meeting, this same foundation is being presented in a Turkish MGK meeting as a “threat.”

Erdoğan has asserted that the Gülen movement is to be included in the Red Book as a “prioritized threat.” But never mind the fact that he acts and speaks as though this has all been decided upon already. The fact is, he does not have the proper authority to do this. What's more, there is absolutely no document or piece of information that would support such a move.

On top of that, the prosecutor's office has still not opened a single investigation into this peaceful movement. Nor is there any official complaint against the movement lodged with the courts.

In short, the war being waged by Erdoğan against the Gülen movement really only serves his political interests. What Erdoğan is now aiming to do is extricate himself from the difficult position into which he's been placed by way of the Dec. 17-25 investigations by opening up a war against the Gülen movement. He is trying to strengthen his own political position by painting the rightfully respected and esteemed Gülen movement as evil. Trying to get the Gülen movement placed on the MGK agenda as a “priority threat” is nothing other than a blatantly simplistic propaganda technique.

So, will the other members who sit on the MGK go along with this technique? With so many pressing items on the agenda these days, will the MGK really work as Erdoğan's private propaganda machine? We don't believe so. It is particularly impossible for the military members of the MGK to not ask this question: “According to which evidence and which reasoning are we to place the Gülen movement on our agenda as a 'priority threat'?”

Published on Today's Zaman, 28 October 2014, Tuesday

Related

Warning of another Feb. 28 on the eve of an MGK meeting

$
0
0
Erhan Başyurt

Tomorrow the National Security Council (MGK) will convene. Turkey is going through a grave security crisis due to the situation in Syria and Iraq, and the escalation of domestic terror. The road map, the peshmerga corridor, martyred security forces…

On the other hand, some try to create the impression that the meeting will focus not on the above issues, but will be a Feb. 28-style get-together. We are reminded of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s statement he made on the plane on his way back from Afghanistan, where he said: “The Parallel Structure or the parallel government formation is one of the elements posing a threat to our national security. Those threats will be on our agenda for the meeting of the National Security Council this month.”

We talked with a senior military specialist on the issue. He shared his experiences. And he warned us.

The military paid the price

Here are some of his striking assessments:
“In the Feb. 28 process ‘obscurantism’ (‘irtica’) was included in the National Security Policy Document (MSGB), known as the Red Book. That decision made its way afterward into Turkey’s National Military Strategy (TÜMAS) document, which is one of the basic books of the army. So the army was asked to take measures against domestic and foreign threats. They were forced to include it into the TÜMAS document, because the Cabinet told them to ‘take action.’ That is how the army prepares TÜMAS – it relies on the documents presented to them.

That is how the West Working Group (BÇG) was founded. Based on TÜMAS, which in turn is based on the MSGB, orders were given to even the smallest divisions in the army hierarchy. Many officers were scrutinized after those orders and thrown out of the army. Many families were hurt.

My friends in the military who signed those practices are now being tried for the 67th trial of the Feb. 28 case. The case concerns not just figures like Çetin Doğan, Çevik Bir and Erol Özkasnak, who made up an imaginary and legally non-existent threat of ‘obscurantism,' but also several other officers who operated as captains or majors down the chain of command at the time. Their guilt is to follow orders stipulated by the MGSB and TÜMAS… Let’s assume the ‘Parallel Structure’ is included in the MGSB as a threat. The army would have to rearrange TÜMAS accordingly.

Courses of action would be determined against the Parallel Structure. Maybe a ‘Parallel Structure Working Group’ would be created.

It is the army’s responsibility towards civilians to make the necessary arrangements in TÜMAS and related plans of action, and to engage in monitoring activities… If the army does not include in TÜMAS the methods of struggle against a threat, the Prime Minister would not approve it… In that sense, the army would have no choice but to prepare those plans of action… And it would communicate it to the last military unit, as were the case with Feb. 28. Again, many innocent members of the military and their families will be hurt. And the lower officers who are forced to follow orders may some five or ten years later find themselves in court – like the Feb. 28 suspects who were put to trial for carrying out work on obscurantism, which had no legal validity.

So who is the culprit here? Civilians? Or the military? Today, neither civilians, nor the media, nor the financial leg of the Feb. 28 case is on trial.

The only scapegoat is the army. My close colleagues are on trial. And I’m afraid the military will be again victimized…”

A pathetic situation

The military specialist’s comments on Feb. 28, the BÇG and the ‘witch hunt’ carry great weight. I hope the present “parallel” paranoid will not lead to another BÇG-like formation, dragging Turkey again into a state of coup d’etat… The debates we witness actually point to another significant fact: those who signed the plan to “End the Gülen Movement” at the National Security Council in 2004 approved it not because they were “forced by circumstances,” but because they wanted it. Three years after their approval they woke up in 2007 with the April 27 Declaration. But today, they put pressure on the military wing of the MGK to target religious people and to prepare plans against them – just as it happened with Feb. 28. It is a pathetic situation indeed… May Allah wake them up!

Published on BGNNews, 29 October 2014, Wednesday

Related

Is Anybody Out There?

$
0
0
Emre Çelik

It's unfortunate when an organization tasked with providing help to the needy must ask for help itself. It's even more unfortunate when the help it seeks is rooted in deliberate and systematic suppression. In Turkey today, relief organization Kimse Yok Mu, affiliated with the Fethullah Gulen inspired Hizmet movement has become the target of repeated attacks by Turkey's political neo-tyrants, the most prominent of whom is President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

The frustration associated with government sponsored degradation became common to members of Hizmet movement. And now, these same frustrations are being felt by charitable organizations affiliated with the movement, including Kimse Yok Mu, which loosely translates to, "Is anybody out there?" These words -- originally uttered by those trapped under the rubble of hundreds of apartments and homes after the horrific 1999 earthquake in Turkey -- became the signature phrase of a charity telethon to raise funds for the disaster and eventually became the name of the fully fledged relief organization. Since then, the charity group has grown into Turkey's largest NGO based relief organization, active across six continents with projects in more than 100 countries.

Since an investigation implicated the sons of Turkey's highest-ranking officials, Erdogan has set about to destroy not only the movement itself, but all organizations with any degree of affiliation. The President has shown little reserve in his tactics, repeatedly resorting to slander and hate speech when speaking about Mr. Gulen and the movement during speeches at political rallies and interviews for television.

Some may question the veracity of the word "tyrant." An outside observer might wonder whether a popularly-elected leader could, over the course of 12 years, be capable of tyranny. Plato and Aristotle define a tyrant as, "one who rules without law, looks to his own advantage rather than that of his subjects, and uses extreme and cruel tactics -- against his own people as well as others."

By using the power of his office to overthrow a civilian organization committed to the values of education, philanthropy and interfaith dialogue, Erdogan has certainly earned the title of tyrant. Focused on the promotion of unfounded and outrageous accusations, Erdogan has turned Turkey into an illiberal democracy, sacrificing the principles of due processes, free press, right of assembly and societal harmony.

Since the December 17, 2013 corruption probe, Erdogan has made the movement his number one target. As the primary recipient of his attacks, members of the Hizmet movement have emerged in a precarious position. Although it may be tempting to succumb to Erdogan's bouts by either giving in or fighting back, the principles outlined by Mr. Gulen explain that each individual has a basic responsibility to contribute to the betterment of society. Responding to Erdogan by either accepting defeat or committing to rebuttal would violate this responsibility.

Instead, members of the Hizmet movement have stayed true to their promise of living life for the benefit of others and continue to operate in spite of verbal and legal assaults. During the demolition of school buildings and attacks on Bank Asya, Hizmet participants rallied together and kept morale high. Most recently, a government-initiated decision to cancel Kimse Yokmu's permission to create relief campaigns associated with Eid al Adha (the Muslim festival of sacrifice that initiates an important charitable period when money and food is donated to the poor) challenged the moral compasses of members of the movement. Nevertheless, the organization channeled its strength and stayed true to its cause in the face of threat, collecting twice as much as it had last year during the same period.

However, the strength and resources of the Turkish government must not be underestimated. As the movement continues to serve communities in more than 150 nations across hundreds of cities, towns and municipalities, the global community must come to recognize the legitimate threat posed to its existence. If successful in his pursuit, the wider civil society landscape in Turkey will have lost one of its greatest proponents and the fate of Turkey's democracy will remain in a precarious state. In this scenario, Erdogan will have defeated a group focused on upholding the rights of civil society and democratic values in Turkey and promoting the protection of basic human rights and values around the world.

Civil society building initiatives sponsored by the movement have transformed communities by way of investment in education, intercultural dialogue and community service from Nepal to New Zealand; from Nigeria to New York.

For the sake of Turkey's future and the global need for groups committed to building strong and resilient communities, we must now ask the following question: Is anybody out there?

Published on The Huffington Post, 29 October 2014, Wednesday

‘Erdoğan has replaced 1980 coup generals'

$
0
0
Dr. Selim Kaptanoğlu, former Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) politician and former doctor of late iconic MHP leader Alparslan Türkeş, said on Tuesday that President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has replaced the National Security Council (MGK) of the Sept. 12, 1980 military coup by amassing power.

Kaptanoğlu, a long-time deputy secretary-general of the MHP, also criticized Erdoğan's effort to include the Hizmet movement, a grassroots religious and social movement, in the state's so-called “red book,” which summarizes the threats against the state, saying such things took place during times of military coups to target the religious and nationalists in particular.

According to Kaptanoğlu, this is an attempt to include all political dissidents in the category of enemies. Should the MGK accept Erdoğan's proposal to include the Hizmet movement to the list national threats, it will lose all credibility, Kaptanoğlu adds.

According to Kaptanoğlu, Erdoğan's fight with Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen is personal. “What did the Gülen movement do? Are you going to call these people terrorists just because they went after thieves?”

Kaptanoğlu was dismissed from his position as a doctor in the military because he signed a report for Türkeş to be released from prison during the Sept. 12 military coup era. According to Kaptanoğlu, the era is now being repeated by means of a government that claims to be civilian and pious.

Referring to the excessive and repressive powers of the MGK in the post-1980 coup era, Kaptanoğlu says it is now Erdoğan who has taken over control of the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. According to Kaptanoğlu, the media affiliated with the Hizmet movement is now the only one resisting the pressure of the government.

“Unfortunately Turkish people always side with the powerful, not with the right,” Kaptanoğlu said.

Closing down Turkish schools ‘treason'

Stating that Turkish schools around the world are realizing the dream of the late Türkeş and nationalists in Turkey, Kaptanoğlu said the government's attempt to close down these schools is a great treason and anti-patriotic.

According to Kaptanoğlu, prep schools and the dormitories of the Hizmet movement in southeastern Turkey were closed down due to the agreement in Oslo conducted between the government and the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) because the Hizmet movement is considered an obstacle to the terrorists.

Published on Today's Zaman, 29 October 2014, Wednesday

'Red Book' should not be used as a threat, analysts say

$
0
0
Former members of the National Security Council (MGK) have warned that the “Red Book,” a national security document in which major threats against the nation are enumerated, should not be used as a tool for threats, but expressed concern that the government is possibly used it in just such a way.

President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan recently signaled that the faith-based Hizmet movement might be declared a terrorist group in the "National Security Strategy Concept Paper," which is often referred to as the “Red Book.”

“In my opinion, [the government] will use this as a tool to threaten [the public] ahead of the [upcoming] general elections,” Sadettin Tantan, a former interior minister, told Today's Zaman. “He [Erdoğan] will seek to reach an agreement with Hizmet ahead of the elections in 2015 by putting pressure on the public, but especially on Hizmet,” Tantan maintained.

Following two graft probes that went public in December of last year, part of which led to four Cabinet ministers leaving their posts, Erdoğan accused the Hizmet movement, which is inspired by respected Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen, of being behind the probes. Describing the corruption probes as a plot against the government, Erdoğan also claimed Hizmet was part of an international plot to topple the government.

Erdoğan's argument reveals that the government may attempt to eliminate all dissident groups by including them in the "Red Book" as a serious threat to national security. The "Red Book" is also known as being the “secret constitution” of the country.

During a rally in mid-October, Erdoğan signaled that he would bring up Hizmet as an issue at an MGK meeting at the end of the month and that Hizmet would be included in the "Red Book" as a national domestic threat. "My personal agenda at this month's MGK meeting [set for Oct. 30] is to revise the National Security Strategy Concept Paper in terms of the [domestic] elements that pose a threat to our country," Erdoğan said.

According to Tantan, who served as minister of interior between 1999 and 2001, it would not make much difference if the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) were to change the "Red Book," as the AK Party has negotiated with a terrorist organization before, despite the fact that it appeared in the "Red Book" as a national security threat. Noting that the outlawed Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) was included in the "Red Book" as a national security threat in 2006, Tantan said: “Look at what happened in 2006. The [AK Party] government at the time was in talks with the PKK. Yet the PKK appeared as a domestic threat in the National Security Strategy Concept Paper,” Tantan underlined, noting that the government has a habit of violating the law.

The government launched a settlement process two years ago with the PKK, which is recognized as a terrorist organization by Turkey, the US and the EU, to resolve the country's Kurdish issue and terrorism problem.

Yaşar Yakış, a former minister of foreign affairs for the AK Party, referred to the claim that Hizmet may be labeled a terrorist organization, underlining that no one can be declared guilty until they are proven to have committed a crime.

In a statement to Today's Zaman, Yakış said: “It is not right that people are accused of being guilty or innocent before a court trial [to that end] is concluded. The presumption of innocence, one of the fundamental principles of the law, stipulates that the accused should be considered innocent until proven otherwise. If there is a practice [in place concerning the Hizmet movement] that violates this principle, I am against that practice. If [the government] is trying to make innocent people look like a terrorist organization, it should be proven with convincing evidence that they have been involved in armed acts or that they are determined to resort to [using] weapons in their acts.”

The book was last revised in 2010 after the expression “fundamentalism” was excluded from the critical document for the first time in the history of the Turkish Republic. For many years, the term has been used as a tool by the military authorities to smear and put pressure on religious parts of society, as seen when a coalition government led by a now-defunct conservative party was forced to step down by the military on Feb. 28, 1997, an event that has since come to be known as a "postmodern coup."

Other than the president and prime minister, deputy prime ministers, the interior minister, the foreign minister, the justice minister and the defense minister as well as the chief of General Staff and the commanders-in-chief of the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) take part in the bi-monthly MGK meetings. Concepts such as fundamentalism, ultra-nationalism, communism and terrorism were frequently put in the "Red Book" from time to time, based on changes in the country's threat perception.

The document, after defining the scope and priority of the threat, details methods of fighting and eliminating the threat.

Published on Today's Zaman, 29 October 2014, Wednesday

Main Opposition Deputy Head Slams Gov't For Targeting Hizmet Movement

$
0
0
Republican People's Party (CHP) Deputy Chairman Faruk Logoglu criticized government, which signaled Hizmet Movement should be included in “Red Book,” a national security document in which major threats against the nation are enumerated, on Thursday. Logoglu responded questions asked by the reporters.

Republican People's Party (CHP) Deputy Chairman Faruk Logoglu criticized government, which signaled Hizmet Movement should be included in “Red Book,” a national security document in which major threats against the nation are enumerated, on Thursday.

Logoglu responded questions asked by the reporters at a press conference. He was reminded President Recep Tayyip Erdogan who signaled that the faith-based Hizmet movement might be declared a terrorist group in the "National Security Strategy Concept Paper," which is often referred to as the “Red Book.” Logoglu said he does not find such a recommendation credible and right.

“The government has such a characteristic. It always needs a scapegoat it can point at… ‘Parallel structure’ is behind everything. 'Parallel structure' is responsible for everything. I don’t find this credible and I don’t find right either,” said Logoglu.

Following two graft probes that went public in December of last year, part of which led to four Cabinet ministers leaving their posts, Erdogan accused the Hizmet movement, which is inspired by respected Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen, of being behind the probes. Describing the corruption probes as a plot against the government, Erdogan also claimed Hizmet was part of an international plot to topple the government.

Published on Cihan, 30 October 2014, Thursday

TUSKON to sue dailies over disputed land reports

$
0
0
Leading Turkish business group, the Turkish Confederation of Businessmen and Industrialists (TUSKON) said on Thursday it will soon file lawsuits against certain government dailies which published allegations of irregularities regarding disputed land in İstanbul.

Following a government decision earlier this week, a tender for a large parcel of land in İstanbul, which was previously won by TUSKON, was reopened despite a prior court decision barring such a move. Although it acquired the land in İstanbul's Yenibosna district in a tender put out by the Finance Ministry back in 2011, TUSKON said, the same land was offered in a tender to other entrepreneurs on Monday this week. Following the tender, government dailies Sabah, Yeni Şafak and Yeni Akit published reports including false information and slander targeting TUSKON, the confederation said on Thursday, adding that it had commenced legal proceedings against the “smear campaign.”

TUSKON said in a written statement on Thursday that the confederation denies the information published in some of the pro-government dailies.

The confederation acquired the land in 2011 in a tender put out by the Finance Ministry, and agreed to rent it for 49 years at a price of TL 1.6 million per year. However, earlier this year, the Prime Ministry attempted to cancel the ongoing authorization process, which had already been extended on two occasions. A subsequent court decision resulted in a stay of execution which barred the cancellation of the process. However, according to TUSKON's statement, a new tender was opened for the 36,000-square-meter piece of land on Monday by Emlak Konut GYO -- a subsidiary of the Housing Development Administration of Turkey (TOKİ) -- in defiance of the court decision. A total of 13 companies participated in the first session of the tender process on Monday.

Published on Today's Zaman, 30 October 2014, Thursday

Related

AK Party brings back internal enemy card to divert attention

$
0
0
In open contradiction with its history and past promises, the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government is getting ready to denounce the faith based Hizmet movement as a national security threat in the latest meeting of the National Security Council (MGK) under the leadership of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan on Thursday in Ankara.

Erdoğan's months-long smear campaign against the Hizmet movement has already become well known both at home and abroad since massive corruption allegations allegedly including Erdoğan's family broke out on Dec. 15 and 25. The Hizmet movement has been deemed responsible for the judicial investigations, since then Erdoğan has been calling the movement a “parallel structure,” a state within the state, although no concrete evidence has been presented to support his arguments.

Erdoğan recently announced that the Hizmet movement will be included on the list of national security threats, which is often referred as the “red booklet,” that is updated by the MGK. When he was prime minister of the AK Party government, Erdoğan criticized the existence of the “red booklet” on March 26, 2013 as a source of “artificial threats” to place pressure on society. For years the red booklet included “reactionary movements” as a domestic threat to suppress religious movements in the country and to justify antidemocratic measures taken against them especially during the post Feb. 28 coup era.

Erdoğan had argued that the red booklet existed for the sake of social engineering, to create fear to justify acts against reactionary movements and separatism. “We removed their red booklet,” Erdoğan said. Now it seems as if he is trying to return it.

Criticizing Erdoğan's attempt to use the MGK for his own political purposes, Deputy Chairman of the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) Oktay Viral said on Thursday that Erdoğan coined the term “parallel structure” to cover up the corruption investigations that were made public on Dec. 17 and 25. He urged the MGK to fight against real and concrete threats such as the terrorist Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) and Kurdish Communities Union (KCK) instead of creating ghost enemies.

Another leading AK Party member, then Deputy Prime Minister and government spokesperson Cemil Çiçek also criticized the “red booklet” following a MGK meeting on Nov. 22, 2010. He said that no group that is part of the nation should be considered a threat to the nation and that is impossible to be defined legally can be included in this document.

Law professor: No such norm as ‘Red Book'

Professor İzzet Özgenç, one of the main authors of the Turkish Penal Code (TCK) and Code on Criminal Procedure (CMK), has criticized recent developments surrounding the National Security Policy Document, also known as the “Red Book.”

Özgenç stated that there is no place for the “Red Book,” a national security document in which major threats against the nation are enumerated, within the guidelines of the Constitution. The law professor added that there could only be one reason as to why government officials are concerned over a document whose content and nature is unclear, and why they see it as a source of authority. “Turkey is not yet a state [that follows the rule] of law,” Özgenç explained.

In a series of tweets, Özgenç stated the following via his social media account yesterday: “These days, the National Security Policy Document -- or the document also known as the ‘Red Book' -- is being mentioned with frequency. The Constitution lists the ‘State of Law' as one of the characteristics of the Turkish Republic [Article 2]. The National Security Policy Document is not stated as one of the norms of the State of Law. Even if not a ‘norm,' there is no provision within the Constitution that orders the preparation or organization of this document, [about] which we, as citizens or even scientists, have no knowledge regarding the content. What the ‘Red Book,' found only in the hands of those concerned, is used for is unknown by us. The only reason why government officials have become concerned over this document, with its unclear nature and content, and see it as a source of authority can be this: The Turkish Republic is not yet a state of law.”

According to a 2010 report by the Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation (TESEV), a prominent think tank, the National Security Policy Document is a top secret document which lacks legal basis but in which the principles of domestic, foreign and defensive action are identified by the Cabinet based on the recommendations of the National Security Council (MGK).

President Erdoğan recently signaled that the faith-based Hizmet movement might be declared a terrorist group in the National Security Policy Document.

Published on Today's Zaman, 30 October 2014, Thursday

Top security council's vague wording draws reactions

$
0
0
A vaguely worded statement issued by Turkey's top security body on Thursday, which listed internal and external threats directed at Turkey, drew harsh rebuke from opposition parties.

Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) leader Devlet Bahçeli reacted harshly to the National Security Council's (MGK) declaration, saying that those who included the Hizmet movement on the list of threats protected the terrorist Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) and gave it a series of privileges.

“The attacks staged by the PKK were not added in the MGK final declaration. The meeting, which is said to have broken a record in terms of its duration, has not made any serious decisions concerning the nation's interests. Doesn't the MGK feel uneasy about terrorist groups, which will spell trouble for Turkey?” Bahçeli questioned.

In a statement issued after a record 10-and-a-half-hour meeting, chaired for the first time by the president, MGK said the participants emphasized that they will, "determinedly continue the fight against parallel structures that conduct illegal activities under the guise of internal or external legal structures and illegal formations that threaten our national security and disrupt public order.”

The term “parallel structure,” which was coined by President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in the wake of a major corruption investigation that went public with a wave of detentions on Dec. 17, 2013, refers to alleged sympathizers of Hizmet in state bureaucracy. Hizmet is a popular social movement inspired by Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen. The detainees in the corruption investigation included the sons of former ministers, bureaucrats and businessmen close to the government.

Erdoğan, who was prime minister at the time, dismissed the investigation as an attempt to bring down his government by the “parallel structure” and foreign collaborators, vowing that he would do whatever it took to eliminate the “parallel structure” even if it meant a “witch hunt.”

Masum Türker, the leader of the Democratic Left Party (DSP), said the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government is keen to take over or exert pressure on any institution that is deemed disloyal to its rule.

“The government can easily classify bar associations, unions or civic groups as legal institutions but as ones conducting illegal activities threatening Turkey's national security,” Türker said.

“Even foreign embassies of several countries may be placed under the same category,” he underlined.

In contrast to Erdoğan's use of the term “parallel structure” in singular form, the MGK statement referred to “parallel structures,” signaling that it may not be solely aimed at Hizmet but may very well include other disparate groups as well.

It was not clear whether the veiled MGK reference to the Hizmet movement would have legal implications or what measures the promised fight would involve. News reports in the pro-government media had said before the MGK meeting that the council was set to include the Hizmet movement in the "Red Book," a classified document listing external and internal threats to Turkey's national security.

Main opposition Republican People's Party (CHP) deputy Musa Kuşoğlu has criticized MGK's focus on the “parallel structure” issue and said the main focus should be on PKK terrorism.

"The PKK established its own courts in the east of the country. The MGK should have handled this threat," he said.

Having held a press conference in Parliament on Friday, Kuşoğlu stressed that the lack of public order in one-third of the country, referring to the PKK's intensified illegal activities in the region, should have been mentioned and went on to say: "If a state cannot perform the tasks that it is responsible for and cannot maintain law and order, then some structures take advantage of the power vacuum. Today we see such a vacuum. No one can deny that there are de facto PKK courts there. Their so-called security forces collect tax. The local people are afraid of the PKK, not the state. MGK should address this problem."

MHP Parliamentary Group Deputy Chairman Oktay Vural also criticized MGK's final declaration which did not address the graft issue that implicated members of the government, asking whether corruption and bribery were not real threats to the country.

“The MGK meetings revealed that they are not following real threats to the country, such as the settlement process and fight against PKK terrorists. It turned out that they are far from responding to the country's real challenges and are instead conducting meaningless gatherings,” he noted.

Vural also slammed the definition the Hizmet movement was given in the meeting, “…the parallel structures conducting illegal activities under the guise of legal image,” saying: “What does it mean? You call something legal or illegal. This definition paves the way for portraying anyone at anytime as a threat which is in contradiction with the law. It means they were established in compliance with the law but illegal in essence. What nonsense. It only serves to disregard the rule of law.”

Enraged by the lack of reference to the corruption scandal surrounding the government Vural added: “Our people are indeed wondering whether the graft gang's intervention in the judiciary was dealt with during the meeting. Are not corruption and bribery a threat for the country? I wonder when MGK will express an opinion asking for the mobilization of the law against those who were implicated in the graft.”

MGK, a body which meets bi-monthly and consists of the president, top government leaders and military commanders, said it also discussed a settlement process, which is aimed at resolving the Kurdish issue, and vowed to take measures to maintain public order in the face of, “provocative incidents designed to ruin the positive atmosphere and peace resulting from the settlement process.”

The process, which involves secret talks with the imprisoned leader of the outlawed PKK initiated in 2011, faced a major test when PKK sympathizers took to the streets in violent demonstrations to protest the onslaught by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) on the Syrian Kurdish town of Kobani and Turkey's reluctance to help in the town's defense. Nearly 40 people were killed in the protests earlier this month.

The military members of the MGK reportedly expressed their concerns regarding the murders of the members of the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) in the country's east, following these same violent demonstrations.

The murders of the military members are considered damaging to the settlement process.

Published on Today's Zaman, 31 October 2014, Friday
Viewing all 4761 articles
Browse latest View live